Solid intake form structure. Section 9 on rough value estimate being required is brilliant, forces stakeholders to articulate ROI before anyone invests time. In my experiance, most AI project failures come from fuzzy problem definitions rather than technical limits. The distinction between 'nice-to-have' and 'business-critical' in section 12 should prevent scope creep battles later.
Thanks! The big thing is framing each use case as a business problem, not an AI project. It makes prioritization easier, keeps things focused, and helps us measure impact.
Solid intake form structure. Section 9 on rough value estimate being required is brilliant, forces stakeholders to articulate ROI before anyone invests time. In my experiance, most AI project failures come from fuzzy problem definitions rather than technical limits. The distinction between 'nice-to-have' and 'business-critical' in section 12 should prevent scope creep battles later.
Thanks! The big thing is framing each use case as a business problem, not an AI project. It makes prioritization easier, keeps things focused, and helps us measure impact.